Jatura interview kits give every interviewer the same role-specific questions, 1-5 scoring rubrics and weighted core competencies, generated automatically when you publish a job. They are for hiring teams that want consistent, comparable interview feedback instead of each interviewer improvising.
Better hiring decisions
Reduction in bias
Faster interview prep
Everything your team needs to conduct fair, effective interviews
Get 5-8 targeted questions for each role automatically. Behavioral, technical, and situational questions tailored to the job requirements.
Detailed 1-5 scoring criteria for each question. Interviewers know exactly what to look for in candidate responses.
4-5 key competencies with weights to focus evaluation on what matters most for the role.
Expected answer guidance helps interviewers recognize great responses and probe deeper when needed.
Everyone uses the same kit. Collect consistent feedback from all interviewers for accurate comparisons.
Interview kits are created automatically when you publish a job. No manual setup required.
From published job to comparable scorecards in six steps.
When you publish a role, Jatura creates the interview kit automatically from the job requirements. Nothing to set up.
Each kit has 5-8 questions across behavioral, technical and situational types, tailored to the role.
4-5 core competencies with weights show interviewers what to evaluate most heavily for this role.
Every question has 1-5 scoring criteria and expected answer guidance, so interviewers know what a strong response looks like and when to probe deeper.
Each interviewer records feedback against the same kit, so scorecards line up side by side.
Review feedback from the whole panel in one place and make the hiring decision with evidence you can explain.
If interviews have been unplanned conversations, a kit gives every interviewer a clear starting point without a week of preparation.
When more than one person interviews, the same questions and rubric keep feedback comparable instead of five unrelated opinions.
Recorded scores against shared criteria give you a clear record of why one candidate was chosen over another.
The usual alternative is a shared document, a spreadsheet of notes and each interviewer's memory.
| Shared doc and notes | Jatura interview kits | |
|---|---|---|
| Questions | Written by each interviewer | Generated for the role when you publish the job |
| Scoring | Informal impressions | 1-5 rubric for every question |
| Priorities | Unstated | 4-5 weighted core competencies |
| Feedback | Scattered across tools | Collected against the same kit |
| Preparation | Starts from a blank page | Ready when the job goes live |
Pair kits with AI recruiting and the applicant tracking system. See all features, pricing, how Jatura compares, alternatives and explainable AI hiring.
An interview kit is a ready-made set of role-specific questions, 1-5 scoring rubrics, weighted core competencies and answer guidance. Every interviewer for a role uses the same kit, so feedback is consistent and comparable.
Jatura generates a kit automatically when you publish a job. It includes 5-8 targeted behavioral, technical and situational questions tailored to the job requirements, so there is no manual setup.
Interview kits are included on every paid plan, starting at $79/month on Starter, and you can try them during the 14-day free trial. Every paid plan includes unlimited team members, so every interviewer can use the kit.
No. Interview kits structure the conversation and the scoring, and people make the decision. Where AI scores applicants, it gives a plain-English breakdown of strengths and gaps, scores are overridable, and nothing is auto-rejected.
When every candidate is asked comparable questions and scored on the same 1-5 rubric, decisions rest on the same evidence rather than on who impressed an interviewer in conversation. That makes decisions easier to explain, though it does not remove the need for human judgment.
Yes. Everyone interviewing for a role works from the same kit and records feedback against the same criteria, which keeps comparisons between candidates accurate.