Most "best ATS" lists rank whoever pays the affiliate fee. This one compares the things that actually decide it for a team under fifty people: what it costs, whether that cost is published, and whether adding a hiring manager costs extra.
We make one of these tools, so read the table and check the vendors' own pricing pages. We've noted where Jatura is the wrong answer.
| ATS | Entry price | Seats | Price public | Best suited to |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jatura | $79/mo | Unlimited | Teams who want AI review on inbound applications without a sales call. | |
| Manatal | $15/user/mo | Per user | Recruitment and staffing agencies managing client pipelines. | |
| Breezy HR | $157/mo | Unlimited | Teams wanting a free tier to trial one role before committing. | |
| Workable | $299/mo | Employee bands | Larger SMBs that also want sourcing and an HRIS in one bill. | |
| Recruitee | Quote only | Tiered | Collaborative hiring where many managers score candidates. | |
| Ashby | Quote only | Per seat | Well-funded startups scaling past 200 people with a recruiting team. |
Entry prices are the lowest published paid plan at the time of writing. "Quote only" means the vendor does not publish a figure. Verify before you buy — these change.
You need outbound sourcing. Jatura works the applications that come to you. If your problem is that nobody applies, a sourcing-led tool will serve you better.
You're an agency billing clients. Manatal is built around agency workflows and client pipelines in a way a direct-hire ATS is not.
You need SAML SSO or an HRIS sync today. Those are on our roadmap, not in the product. If IT requires them to sign off, we're not ready for you yet.
Fourteen days, full access, no card. Compare the shortlist against whatever you use now.